Showing posts with label Writing/Research/Editing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing/Research/Editing. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Spelling, Grammar, and Remembering Homophones

A pair of pears, get it?
This past week I've received my usual hundreds of emails per day from writers' groups, community blogs and writing programs. Nothing unusual about that really. What is alarming: the percent of "writerly" emails packed with spelling errors, grammatical errors and misused words or phrases - the kind that most of us should have mastered by middle school, especially those of us who claim to be writers.

        Are they the result of sloppy proofreading or something more profound? Proofreading is mysterious and elusive! Proofreading and then proofreading already proofread work tends to reveal an error here and there that we were certain we fixed. I'm no exception. Typos happen to everyone - the unavoidable function of typing quickly in our efforts to keep up with thoughts moving forward much too quickly for our fingers to keep pace.

        In all honesty, it's not as though I'm exempt from typographical errors or spelling mistakes but there are several tricks that, while old-fashioned and very low tech, remain tried and true.

        First: I reread all my work aloud, even writing I'm positive I've already proofread and already corrected.

        Second: I actually print out my work.  I've yet to understand it but transitioning from a screen to ink on paper often reveals something I missed before - sometimes simply an extra space or superfluous comma, but they do appear easier to spot.

        Last: Once printed, I walk away for a while - ideally, a day or two but not always. Coming back for a second, and even third, view can yield a few more surprises.

        Even with all those precautions, I've had the horrifying experience of reading an essay I've published or something I've posted online only to discover a glaring mistake gone public! For some mysterious reason, it totally evaded detection.

        The event that inspired my current rant: four emails I received this morning from writers' blogs, writing journals and community boards for writers. Of those four, three had blatant errors. The particular errors that seem incredible are grammatical or word usage ones made by those who consider themselves to be professional writers.

Number I - from a community blog for food writers as follows:
        "If your a food blogger or writer..."
My guess is that the intended word is "you're," the contracted form of "you are."
Number II - an email from an organization that supports writers stating:
        "You should of received your first newsletter ..."
The correct statement, "you should have..." should have been mastered by third or fourth grade.
Number III -  a set of guidelines for posting from an online community for women writers I joined recently. Etiquette rules are a primary concern as the email noted:
        "We have a no-all-caps policy. We want to remain a polite, positive group and if a few people are aloud to shout, it spoils it for us all!"

And that noted, shouting aloud may work in a sentence but wouldn't it make more sense for writers to request that participants not be allowed to shout? Hopefully, this was just an example of "clumping theory" that seems more common in probability studies.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Elections, Writer's Block & Great Writing Moments Remembered

For several days now I've been experiencing one of those things I've heard writers complain about so often - the one that hasn't plagued me since those days when I was writing my Ph.D. dissertation! It's the bane of writers throughout history: Writer's Block.

I've been facing a blank notepad, a shining computer screen, and simply staring with glazed-over eyes. The challenge of embarking on a new essay or concept summary seems daunting. Maybe it's because for the last month I've focused most of my efforts on editing, re-editing and re-re-editing my collection of short stories. Or, maybe it's all the election buzz, television overload, radio commentators, newspaper headlines and persistent public chatter that's driving me to distraction? Fortunately, it will end by midnight Tuesday. Unfortunately, and in all likelihood, it will be replaced with post-election analysis overload.

Complaining to a writing friend yesterday, she offered some sage advice. "Just forget your 'writer's block' for a few minutes and think consider this idea: try to remember your best and most productive writing moments. Try to recall,  not so much the event or time but rather, the feelings." The only way for me to imagine those times was also to consider what's changed, what's different? I thought about that one for a good long time before an answer began to bounce around my cranium! Now it seems ridiculously simple and trite yet none the less accurate!

Nothing outside is different or, that is,  different enough to inhibit my usual uninhibited flow. What's really changed over the past decade however are the demands I make of myself - the expectations I put on my writing, my editing, and upon the lyrical quality and nature of my words. The more words I put on a page, and the more writers' whose art I read, the greater are the demands I place on my own writing. It's impossible to identify my best writing moments, but recalling the emotions that accompanied them tells me everything I need to know. And "Inner Critic" is the parent of my "Writer's Block."
My goal on Election Day ever is to banish that Inner Critic until another Election Day rolls around!

Monday, October 1, 2012

Research Time and Place: Salmon River

I've always been intrigued by research - the process, the investigative challenges, and of course the results. Any writing that contains even the slightest reference to a time and place -whether fiction or non-fiction demands validation of facts.

When the writer describes a scene, presents dialogue or refers to an event, the past about which he or she is writing is really occurring the "NOW..." for the characters - individuals who created the public records. Historians may live in the present while looking back into the past but writers have an under-appreciated yet just as important of a responsibility: to place the reader into the context of by-gone events and eras. In doing so, the writer brings characters forward into the present for the reader.

Accuracy allows readers to experience the kinds of emotions with which the characters are dealing - their hopes, conflicts, pain, and resolution but presented accurately so readers will internalize those feelings as though actually living in the time period being written about.

One of my favorite books - one that brilliantly deals with numerous difficulties and concepts of historical research is The Art and Craft of Writing Historical Fiction by James Alexander Thom.  That noted, clearly the same strategies and rules are followed by writers of nonfiction, too!

Thom details methods for:

     *Finding and using historical archives

     *Conducting real-life field research

     *Reconstructing a milieu about which you're writing- people, voices, cultural contexts & physical environments

     *Achieving verisimilitude - the appearance of the true, in speech, action, and setting

I strive, in my writing, to focus upon verifying all information I've gathered that might end up in my stories or essays. To me, it's clear that if I plan to weave historical fact with a compelling plot then accurate descriptions comprise the foundation of my stories' believability.

Several days ago, I was drafting an essay about the first two or three times I ever visited Idaho. Those trips included drives across the Galena Summit and down through the Stanley Basin. Last week I took the same drive. It was twenty years later and when I arrived at an historical scenic overlook, a turnout really on Rt. 75, the road market indicated we were at an elevation of about 8000 ft. The highest peak in the area is 11153!

I was describing rivers. I was checking a map and listing names of those I could see from the overlook. But I was most intrigued by the names of several rivers noted in large italicized fonts on my topographical maps. there is the Big Lost River; another lists the Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness. My reference sources claimed that it is the largest wilderness area in the contiguous United States.

I stopped to take photos. When I read the sign post at the overlook, the graphics and text imbued a drama feel to the sign post when considered within its historical context.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Writing and editing or writing and rewriting and re-rewriting drafts?

Drafting the draft, editing the draft, producing a final draft - all before the first actual first version of an essay or story is a description of a process that made absolutely no sense to me until I began to write in earnest. During the past three weeks, I've been drafting and editing a number of short stories that were reviewed and "workshopped" at the University of Chicago Writers's Studio and at the University of Iowa Summer Writers' Festival.

Recently, I read an article about one of my all time favorite and most inspiring writers - Bernard Malamud. The article claimed that Malamud was legendary for his incredible meticulousness when editing his work. But meticulousness was just one characteristic of his writing habits. He was most notorious for his drafts, edits of his drafts, and then even more edits.  Before embarking on the editing process, it wasn't that unusual for Malamud to write as many as fifty drafts of any given story.

Clearly, by the time Malamud determined, at last, that the story with which he'd been consumed was really done, i.e., "ready for prime time" but not to be confused with finished, he knew every nuance of what was in the story.

Malamud began each of his beloved stories as a vague concept. His hope was to write "story" as a vehicle with which to illustrate precise, deep yet common emotions. But only through successive drafts was it possible for his intuition to dominate. Malamud's intuition provided accurate material, the accuracy of which grew continuously as a result of his continuous scrutiny and persistent revisions.

Literary art is neither entirely conscious nor unconscious; rather, it's an interplay between two attitudes typical of the process top writers employ.  Drafting a story necessitates movement from inception to completion but simultaneously is a move from lesser to greater consciousness in both content and technique.

Much Like musicians and artists, writers practice, learn, and over-learn techniques of their art so that once inculcated, they can be performed with exactness, ease, and proficiency all fed by inspiration.

For those of us who've devoted so much of ourselves to writing, the fantasy that creativity pours spontaneously from the writer entices and thrills us. But reality prevails! Writing - good writing, is a complex process. It seems as though we experience the pleasure of spontaneity and freedom the most during our drafting phases.

Once we put our drafts on the road to becoming a finished work - the phase where drafts begin to transform into eloquent and excellent writing, then our greater focus is upon pleasing potential readers. Writing multiple drafts temporarily ignores readers' needs and pleasures. Instead, if we can extend the writing process a bit, then we also extend the uninhibited and self-indulgent nature of writing but we also extend the stage of most gratifying creativity.

Those not familiar with Bernard Malamud, might be interested to know that he was not regarded as especially prolific but was, and still is, regarded as an outstanding story teller and writer. My personal favorites are The Natural (1952) and The Assistant (1957) but below is a list of Melamud's other works.

The Magic Barrel (1958)
A New Life (1961)
Idiots First (1963)
The Fixer (1966)
Pictures of Fidelman: An Exhibition (1969)
The Tenants (1971)
Rembrandt's Hat (1973)
Dubin's Lives (1979)
God's Grace (1982)
The Stories of Bernard Malamud (1984)
The People and Uncollected Stories (1989)

Friday, January 13, 2012

My Interview with Teri Crane


Late afternoon, my first hour at Ghost Ranch after an exceedingly long day;  a three hour drive to the first airport, two connecting flights, two buses from Albuquerque Airport to Ghost Ranch - first one broke down so we stopped at a casino for some lunch and to await a “rescue” bus.

I struggled up a steep path, perspiring with effort. Teri drove her car alongside me and stopped to offer a ride the rest of the way. I thanked her unconvincingly saying something insane like I needed the exercise. When I arrived at the summit, I saw Teri pull her car into a space and haul two enormous suitcases from its back as though they were empty.  Now this, I thought, is serious writer - a woman who’s going to move mountains during her one week retreat. This is a real writer!

Immediately, I was intimidated by Teri who, as it turned out, was my Ghost Ranch next door neighbor. Nice coincidence but combined with her writing artistry, life wisdom and excellent humor, it was a great one. First impression: Teri is reserved, contemplative, and extremely serious. Real impression: how wrong first impressions often are!

Teri Crane shared her views about her experiences during the week long AROHO Retreat and the insights she gained there.

Is there one specific moment or event at the retreat that sparked an insight or shift in how you perceive either your work or yourself as a writer?
So many ideas, exercises, conversations - all blended together, fortifying one another, speaking at levels known and unknown.  I listened to the wind. I listened to the table talk.  While I was at Ghost Ranch, I realized that I also was listening to my characters. By the time I returned home, I understood so much more about them.

Not being required to adhere to a specific schedule left me open to understanding many things.  The writing process includes enriching periods of fertile idleness and it’s this fertile idleness that’s become part of my writing habit. It leads to putting pen to paper or fingers to keyboard but not feeling driven or compelled. Instead, it’s knowing I’m in process and that gives me the freedom to write.

While I sat with other members of our AROHO community - at meals, in small groups, during evenings listening to readings, or late at night outside talking and sharing where we’ve come from and where we are, I realized I was talking with writers. I realized I am a writer talking with other writers.  It wasn’t at all like talking with non-writers who ask, “What have you written?” That’s really synonymous with “What have you published?” It makes the writing process defined only as the end product. 

In talking with writers, questions about process are more active, such as “What do you write?’ or “What are you working on?” The writing is alive.  We write as we breathe.   By interacting with women at Ghost Ranch, I found my mirror.

Women writers have inspired me since I read Silas Marner in ninth grade English and learned that George Eliot was a woman. Writing is difficult enough, but adding that layer - where acceptance is worked through a sieve of sexism and still attaining success is admirable.  Even though I appreciate writers of both genders because I appreciate great writing, I feel that women writers evoke an edge of sisterhood. We’re all bonded in common struggles.  I‘ve continued to follow works by Toni Morrison, and Alice Walker; I relish reading Alice Hoffman, Anne Tyler, and Annie Dillard’s focused prose.  I admire the way in which Selah Saterstrom weaves a tale with polished prose and was honored to have Selah as the 2nd reader for my MFA thesis book.

What’s the best advice you’ve received about writing?
The best advice I received was from my brother while I working on my doctoral dissertation.  He said, “Don’t worry about being brilliant, only about being finished.”  At the time I thought it was about finishing in a timely manner, that I could be brilliant at some other time. However, while a student at Goddard, I discovered the art of revision. Now I realize it means so much more.  Often I think of his advice and couple it with my current notion: once the story is told, it’s time to polish it up.

How would you describe your typical writing day?
Typical writing day?  What’s that?  My days are filled with writing, whether punctuated with Face Book status updates, e-mails, journal writing, working on my blog, or thinking about (and sometimes actually writing) my current project.  I always feel as though I’m in the writing process whether that means putting words together on paper or thinking about words and ideas.  I guess that’s my typical day---less structure than fluidity but always a connectedness to writing. 

Can you describe for us what you’re currently working on?

My current project is a book. It a fiction story about two women in the 1800’s traveling west with their respective families on a wagon train.  They leave their gentile Eastern lives, learning to exchange their roles for those critical on the westward trek under challenging conditions. They discover that even greater changes are demanded of them at their final destination. 

When I went to the AROHO retreat, somehow I knew that my women characters would travel the Santa Fe Trail but didn’t really know where they’d end up.  Serendipitously, while exploring one day, I discovered that the Old Spanish Trail went through Abiqui on its way to Los Angeles.  It was during that moment I knew my women would be on it!

Bio:
Dr. Teri Crane is a writer, retired teacher and marriage and family therapist.  After stepping aside from classroom teaching, she decided to pursue an MFA in Creative Writing at Goddard College where she wrote a memoir, We Never Used the ‘F’ Word, a story about growing up in her native Southern California and the impact of her father’s death when she was seven years old, which is still pre-published.  Currently she’s working on an historical fiction novel about two women going west by wagon train in the 1800’s, and moderating online classes for teachers through LA County Office of Education.  She is a certified “Journal to the Self Workshop” instructor. 

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

AROHO Speaks: Writer to Writer Interview with Martha Andrews Donovan

Interview with Martha Andrews Donovan 
Martha was interviewed by Marlene Samuels of the AROHO Speaks:Writer to Writer Collaboration Project.
I interviewed Martha Donovan about her AROHO Retreat experience although, at first, I wasn’t entirely sure I’d actually spoken with her during our week at Ghost Ranch. After going back to the retreat website to find Martha’s photograph, I was thrilled to discover that she and I had, in fact, exchanged numerous conversations during meals, while having coffee or during various “mind stretch” presentations.

During the retreat, we all had so much to share with one another about ourselves - as writers and women, as mothers and wives, as teachers and students. Yet, our most unifying issues revolved around the incredible challenges we face that are totally unique to women writers. Martha is one of the many women who inspired me. I hope you’ll find the same inspiration in her words as I do! 



Is there one specific moment or event at the retreat that sparked an insight or shift in how you perceive either your work or yourself as a writer?

I’ve never been good at daily habits beyond teeth brushing. So I was relieved to hear Marilynne Robinson and others at AROHO’s retreat admit that they don’t always write every day, that there are times when they’re feeding their writing in other ways:
Breena Clarke spoke of getting to know her characters best while naked in the shower; Mary Johnson about the value of vegetable chopping and apple picking; Marilynne Robinson about “a room of one’s own” as fine and good but that it makes sense to get out of that room occasionally.